Tesla Model Y Outshines BYD Sealion in Carwow Review After Correction: A Deep Dive for EV Enthusiasts

On April 19, 2025, Carwow issued a correction to its latest electric vehicle (EV) comparison video, admitting an editorial error in its initial verdict. The updated review now confirms the Tesla Model Y as the winner over the BYD Sealion, reversing the original claim that favored the Chinese-made EV. “Our video editor made a mistake with this one, and the original verdict didn’t reflect Mat’s actual thoughts on these cars,” Carwow stated in a pinned post on Youtube. Here we unpack the corrected verdict, delves into the technical details, and explores the broader implications for the EV market.

Carwow’s Revised Verdict: Tesla Model Y Takes the Crown

Carwow’s updated video, hosted by Mat Watson, pits the Tesla Model Y against the BYD Sealion in a head-to-head battle across price, performance, storage, handling, charging, and range. Initially, the review incorrectly stated that the BYD Sealion outperformed the Tesla Model Y in nearly every category. However, Carwow clarified, “We’ve now updated the video to show the correct winner of the test — the Tesla Model Y.” Despite the correction, the outlet noted, “That said, the BYD is still a strong contender! It was a really close comparison.”

The video, titled “New Tesla Model Y v BYD Sealion: Ultimate review!” has amassed 312K views since its release on April 18, 2025. Carwow apologized to Watson and its audience, stating, “Apologies to Mat — and to all of you — for the confusion and for making this change after the video went live.”

Technical Breakdown: Tesla Model Y vs. BYD Sealion

Pricing and Positioning

The Tesla Model Y starts at £45,000 ($58,500 USD, based on an exchange rate of 1 GBP = 1.30 USD), with the top-spec long-range version at £52,000 ($67,600 USD). The BYD Sealion, however, begins at £47,000 ($61,100 USD), with its range-topping model priced at £59,000 ($76,700 USD). This positions the Sealion as the more expensive option, challenging the perception that Chinese EVs are inherently cheaper.

Performance and Drag Race Results

In a quarter-mile drag race, the Tesla Model Y, equipped with dual motors, all-wheel drive, 507 horsepower, and 494 Nm (364 lb-ft) of torque, completed the run in 12.4 seconds. The BYD Sealion, with dual motors, all-wheel drive, 530 horsepower, and 690 Nm (509 lb-ft) of torque, trailed at 12.8 seconds. Despite the Sealion’s higher power output, its heavier weight of 2.4 metric tons (5,291 lbs) compared to the Model Y’s 2 metric tons (4,409 lbs) likely contributed to the result. The 0-60 mph times were nearly identical, with the Tesla at 4.33 seconds and the BYD at 4.35 seconds, but the Tesla pulled ahead at higher speeds.

A rolling race over a half-mile further favored the Tesla, showcasing its superior acceleration and handling dynamics. Watson noted, “The Tesla is dropping this car, so that’s a clean sweep for the Tesla.”

Interior and Technology

The Tesla Model Y’s interior received a facelift, featuring Alcantara-like materials and improved ambient lighting. However, Watson criticized its minimalist design, which relies heavily on the central screen for controls. “It’s also a hassle not being able to control your windscreen wipers through a stalk,” he remarked, highlighting the lack of a heads-up display and the cumbersome process for adjusting mirrors and the steering wheel.

The BYD Sealion’s cabin impressed with its premium feel, featuring leatherette on the dash, comfortable seats, and a heads-up display. It also offers Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, absent in the Tesla. However, its infotainment screen lagged in responsiveness compared to the Tesla’s sharp, quick display. Watson praised Tesla’s navigation system, which calculates charging stops and times for a 500-mile (804 km) journey, calling it “brilliant, and all electric cars should have this.”

Storage and Practicality

Storage capacity emerged as a clear win for the Tesla Model Y. Tesla claims 854 liters (30.2 cubic feet) of boot space, while BYD claims 520 liters (18.4 cubic feet) for the Sealion. In a practical test, the Model Y accommodated more passengers in its boot, and its front trunk (frunk) proved more spacious. Watson confirmed, “It’s a clear win for the Tesla.”

Range and Charging

The Model Y long-range version features a 75 kWh battery, delivering a real-world range of 278 miles (447 km), compared to Tesla’s claimed 364 miles (586 km). The Sealion, with a 91.3 kWh battery in its top trim, averaged 2.5 miles per kWh (4 km/kWh), suggesting a real-world range of roughly 228 miles (367 km), far below expectations due to aggressive testing by journalists.

Tesla’s Supercharger network remains a key advantage, offering cheaper rates for Tesla owners despite being open to all EVs since 2023. The Model Y’s charging efficiency and navigation integration outshone the Sealion, which requires manual planning for charging stops.

Driving Dynamics

The Model Y’s handling impressed Watson, with improved suspension damping over its predecessor. “The car just feels a bit more solid on the road,” he said, noting its responsive steering and progressive brakes. The Sealion, while comfortable over bumps, felt disconnected, with floaty handling and less precise controls.

Market Implications and Industry Context

The Tesla Model Y’s victory reinforces its dominance in the global EV market, where it remains the best-selling EV, with over 1.2 million units sold in 2023 alone. Tesla’s focus on efficiency, charging infrastructure, and software integration continues to set it apart, even as Chinese manufacturers like BYD gain ground. BYD, the world’s second-largest EV maker, delivered 3 million vehicles in 2023, but its Sealion struggles to match Tesla’s real-world performance and efficiency.

Regulatory considerations also play a role. In the U.S., the Biden administration’s 2024 tariffs on Chinese EVs (up to 100%) aim to protect domestic manufacturers, potentially limiting BYD’s market penetration. In Europe, where the Sealion is sold, the EU’s 2024 carbon emission targets push automakers toward EVs, but Tesla’s established Supercharger network gives it a competitive edge.

EVXL’s Take: A Balanced Perspective

The corrected verdict aligns with Tesla’s strengths in efficiency, charging, and driving dynamics, but the BYD Sealion’s competitive pricing and feature-rich interior make it a viable alternative for buyers seeking a different experience. The Sealion’s higher power output and premium cabin appeal to those prioritizing comfort and tech, yet its efficiency and handling shortcomings highlight areas for improvement. For EVXL readers, the Model Y remains the safer bet for long-term ownership, especially with Tesla’s robust charging infrastructure. However, BYD’s rapid advancements signal that Chinese EVs are closing the gap—expect fiercer competition in the coming years.

Carwow’s error underscores the importance of editorial accuracy in automotive journalism, particularly in an industry where consumer decisions hinge on trusted reviews. As the EV market evolves, transparency in testing and reporting will be crucial for maintaining credibility among enthusiasts and owners alike.

Photo courtesy of CarWow.