Ford CEO Jim Farley has publicly backed Waymo’s LiDAR-based self-driving technology, diverging from Tesla’s camera-only approach, signaling a strategic shift for Ford’s autonomous vehicle development. Speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival on June 27, 2025, Farley emphasized the critical role of LiDAR for safety, according to a Fortune report. This stance highlights a growing industry debate over the best path to safe, scalable self-driving systems, with implications for electric vehicle (EV) owners and autonomous driving enthusiasts.

LiDAR vs. Cameras: A Safety-First Strategy

Farley underscored LiDAR’s ability to enhance vehicle perception in challenging conditions, stating, “Where the camera will be completely blinded, the LiDAR system will see exactly what’s in front of you.”

LiDAR, which uses laser pulses to map surroundings in 3D, acts as a “safety net” for scenarios where cameras struggle, such as heavy rain or low-light environments. Ford’s endorsement of Waymo’s approach—combining LiDAR, cameras, and radar—contrasts with Tesla’s reliance on cameras and artificial intelligence for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Robotaxi services.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has defended the camera-only model, arguing it aligns with human driving. In a May 2025 CNBC interview, Musk said, “The way that the road system is designed is for AI. I should say it’s for intelligence, biological neural net and eyes.”

However, Farley’s comments suggest Ford prioritizes redundancy to protect its brand reputation, with LiDAR providing an additional layer of reliability for its future self-driving EVs.

Cost and Scalability Challenges

Cost remains a sticking point in the debate. Musk has criticized Waymo’s system as prohibitively expensive, stating during Tesla’s Q1 2025 earnings call, “The issue with Waymo’s cars is that they cost ‘way mo’ money.”

He estimated Tesla’s vehicles cost 20–25% of Waymo’s, citing lower production volumes and high sensor costs for Waymo’s setup. For context, Waymo’s self-driving vehicles, often retrofitted Chrysler Pacificas, carry advanced sensor suites, with LiDAR units alone costing tens of thousands of dollars, though prices have dropped in recent years. In contrast, Tesla’s 2026 Model Y, equipped with FSD, integrates cameras into its standard design, keeping costs closer to $40,000–$60,000 depending on options.

Electric Vehicle Registrations Surge 20% In March Amid Tariff Concerns

Ford’s BlueCruise, a hands-free highway driving system, is less ambitious than Tesla’s FSD but aligns with General Motors’ Super Cruise. BlueCruise, available on models like the Ford Mustang Mach-E, supports over 130,000 miles of pre-mapped U.S. highways. Farley’s comments indicate Ford may integrate LiDAR into future iterations to compete with Waymo’s urban-focused autonomy, potentially increasing costs but enhancing safety for EV drivers.

Industry and Consumer Implications

Farley’s stance could reshape Ford’s EV strategy, appealing to consumers prioritizing safety in autonomous features. For recreational EV owners, LiDAR-equipped systems may offer greater confidence in varied driving conditions, though higher costs could raise vehicle prices. Industry-wide, Ford’s alignment with Waymo’s model may pressure competitors to adopt hybrid sensor approaches, especially as regulators scrutinize self-driving safety. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported 1,237 autonomous vehicle incidents in 2024, underscoring the need for robust systems.

Ford’s pivot also reflects broader trends in the EV market, where differentiation through advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) is key. As Tesla expands its Robotaxi service, launched in Austin in June 2025, Ford’s LiDAR bet could position it as a safer alternative for fleet operators and individual buyers. However, balancing cost, scalability, and safety will determine whether Ford’s strategy gains traction in the competitive EV landscape.