On May 13, 2025, Vermont Governor Phil Scott announced a pause on the state’s electric vehicle (EV) sales requirements, citing significant challenges with infrastructure and technology. This decision aligns Vermont with broader concerns about the feasibility of zero-emission vehicle rules, originally pioneered by California and adopted by 11 states, including New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts, reports Reuters.

Governor Scott’s Rationale for the Pause

Governor Scott’s decision stems from practical hurdles in meeting California’s ambitious EV targets, which mandate that 35% of light-duty vehicles in the 2026 model year be zero-emission models, with a goal to phase out gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Scott highlighted the state’s unpreparedness, stating, “It’s clear we don’t have anywhere near enough charging infrastructure and insufficient technological advances in heavy-duty vehicles to meet current goals.” This pause reflects Vermont’s struggle to balance environmental goals with operational realities, especially in a rural state where charging stations are sparse and heavy-duty vehicles are critical for industries like logging and agriculture.

Industry and Regulatory Context

Vermont’s move follows a pattern of resistance to California’s EV mandates. Maryland Governor Wes Moore delayed enforcement of these rules until the 2028 model year, citing similar concerns about tariffs and charging infrastructure funding. Meanwhile, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in May 2025 to bar California’s landmark 2035 EV plan, which also aims to increase the number of zero-emission heavy-duty trucks. However, the Senate’s timeline for addressing this measure remains unclear, and California contends that Congress cannot reverse the Biden administration’s decision under fast-track rules.

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing major automakers like General Motors (GM.N), Toyota (7203.T), Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), and Hyundai (005380.KS), has warned that the rules, requiring at least 80% EVs by 2035 and no more than 20% plug-in hybrids, could force car companies to drastically reduce the number of vehicles for sale to meet EV sales quotas. California, however, insists that EVs must constitute 68% of new vehicle sales by 2030 under the rules, a target the state believes is achievable and essential to cut pollution.

Implications for EV Owners and Enthusiasts

For EV owners and enthusiasts in Vermont, this pause introduces uncertainty. The state’s limited charging infrastructure—already a challenge for rural EV drivers—may see slower expansion without the urgency of mandated sales targets. Heavy-duty vehicle operators, such as those in Vermont’s trucking industry, face additional hurdles due to the lack of technological advancements in zero-emission models capable of handling long-haul routes or harsh winter conditions. Nationally, the patchwork of state-level policies could complicate the EV market, potentially slowing adoption rates as automakers navigate differing regulations.

De cara al futuro

Vermont’s decision underscores a critical tension in the EV transition: the gap between ambitious policy goals and on-the-ground realities. While California pushes for a rapid shift to zero-emission vehicles, states like Vermont highlight the need for robust infrastructure and technological readiness. For EV enthusiasts, this development signals a need for advocacy around charging network expansion and innovation in heavy-duty EV technology. As the debate continues, the balance between environmental imperatives and practical implementation will shape the future of electric mobility in the U.S.