Reuters analysis reveals Tesla is taking an unprecedented gamble in the automotive industry: staking its entire car business on models designed between 2017 and 2020 while Chinese EV makers like BYD slash development cycles to two years or less. Industry experts warn this aging product lineup threatens Tesla’s market position as competitors flood showrooms with fresh designs.

Tesla’s 2017 Model 3 sedan and subsequent Model Y crossover ushered in the era of mass-market electric vehicles, transforming CEO Elon Musk’s company into the world’s most valuable automaker. But nearly a decade later, those same vehicles remain the company’s only volume sellers – and Musk has promised no new human-driven cars on the horizon.

Tesla’s Product Lineup Frozen in Time

The stark reality of Tesla’s product strategy became clear in the company’s recent third-quarter earnings. Despite record vehicle deliveries of 497,099 cars, profit plummeted 37% to $1.4 billion – down from $2.2 billion a year earlier. The culprits? Over $400 million in tariff costs, surging R&D spending on artificial intelligence and humanoid robots, and declining revenue from regulatory credit sales.

But the bigger issue lurking beneath those numbers: Tesla has introduced just one new model since the Model Y began production in early 2020 – the polarizing Cybertruck. That stainless-steel pickup flopped spectacularly, selling approximately 16,000 units through September according to Cox Automotive estimates, far short of Musk’s prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales.

Mientras tanto, Tesla killed its $25,000 Model 2 project in early 2024, redirecting resources toward robotaxis and autonomous technology. The company recently introduced stripped-down versions of the Model 3 and Model Y priced at $37,000 and $40,000 respectively – but these are cost-cut variants of existing platforms, not new vehicles.

Chinese Competitors Racing Past Tesla

The contrast with Chinese EV manufacturers couldn’t be starker. BYD, Tesla’s leading global rival, has slashed model development times to two years or less, according to consultancy Alix-Partners. “It’s half the time, and it’s also half the fixed costs,” said Dan Hearsch, co-leader of the automotive and industrial practice at Alix-Partners.

BYD launched at least 17 SUV models from 2020 through 2025 – about double the number of redesigned Ford SUVs in that same period. This rapid-fire approach allows Chinese automakers to “keep up with trends, keep up with what consumer products are doing,” Hearsch explained.

Tom Libby, an S&P Global Mobility analyst, warns that Tesla’s customer loyalty rate plunged last year and only improved after the company doubled its spending on purchase incentives.

“The data show that Tesla is like any other brand,” Libby said. “Over the long term, there’s going to have to be some major product actions or the brand will keep going down.”

The iPhone Strategy Hits Its Limits

Tesla has long treated its vehicles like iPhones – hardware platforms that gain new capabilities through over-the-air software updates rather than complete redesigns. When the company recently made cosmetic updates to the Model 3 and Model Y, industry observers noted the “refresh” generated none of the sales momentum traditional automakers see from ground-up redesigns.

On average, automakers in the United States overhaul their models every eight years, according to S&P Global Mobility data – a timeframe that has shortened over the last decade. Mass-market models get redesigned more frequently, while trucks and luxury vehicles are overhauled less often.

But Tesla hasn’t fully redesigned any model in two decades. The Model 3 is now in its eighth year, and the bigger challenge may be the models’ advancing age.

“You can’t have a portfolio that’s that stale,” said Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA Research who tracks Tesla. “They will be paying a price.”

The Model 3 competes in a smaller, declining segment – compact cars. Libby noted that Tesla’s unusually small lineup also leaves the company out of huge-selling segments like mass-market three-row SUVs, which account for 13% of U.S. vehicle sales.

Robotaxis and Robots Replace Real Cars

During Tesla’s latest earnings call, Musk and other executives devoted little time to discussing the company’s current automotive business, which accounted for 88% of third-quarter revenue. Instead, the focus centered on future plans for self-driving robotaxis and humanoid robots.

“We’re at a critical inflection point for Tesla and our strategy going forward as we bring AI into the real world,” Musk told investors, promising that Tesla is at “the beginning of scaling, quite massively, Full Self-Driving and Robotaxi, and fundamentally changing the nature of transport.”

Adrian Balfour, founder of technology consulting firm Envorso, suggested some industry observers see no reason Tesla must undertake extensive redesign work. “I don’t think they have to do a ton of redesign-type work” to vehicles like the best-selling Model Y, he said, noting Tesla has succeeded in delivering “a high-margin product with no frills” that appeals to customers prioritizing updatable technology over appearance.

But with vehicle sales falling 6% through the first three quarters of this year and facing steep challenges from President Trump’s $7,500-per-vehicle tax credit rollback, Tesla confronts mounting pressure. The pending tax-credit expiration boosted vehicle sales in the third quarter as customers hurried purchases to secure the subsidy, but revenue in quarterly financial results released Wednesday showed profit fell 37% due to higher costs from Trump’s tariffs, increased research-and-development spending, and falling revenue from government regulatory credit sales.

EVXL’s Take

Here at EVXL, we’ve been tracking Tesla’s strategic pivot away from car development for months. Back in June, we reported on Tesla teasing a more affordable model for production starting this month – but those “new” vehicles turned out to be stripped-down versions of existing cars, not the ground-up affordable EV the market was anticipating.

The writing has been on the wall. We’ve documented Tesla’s increasingly desperate measures to move existing inventory: 0% financing deals, aggressive lease promotions, and even 48-hour test drives to get butts in seats. When you’re throwing every incentive at the wall to sell eight-year-old car designs, that’s not the behavior of a confident market leader.

This raises a fundamental question for EV enthusiasts: Can over-the-air updates truly replace the excitement of new sheet metal? Tesla revolutionized the industry by proving EVs could be desirable, but now it’s testing whether software alone can sustain that desire indefinitely. Meanwhile, BYD and other Chinese competitors are deploying the same rapid-iteration playbook Tesla once used to disrupt legacy automakers.

The irony is rich. Tesla became an industry giant by moving faster than incumbents. Now it’s the incumbent moving slower than insurgents. Whether Musk’s bet on robotaxis and humanoid robots pays off remains to be seen, but for EV shoppers in 2025, the message is clear: if you want cutting-edge automotive hardware, you might need to look beyond Fremont.

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Photo credit: Tesla